Ok, so there were a few challenges that ended this month. There are also some new challenges starting tomorrow, so I figured I do somewhat of a challenge round up. First off . . .
This was actually the first challenge I ever entered and I wanted to make sure I didn’t over-extend myself, so I only obligated myself to complete Peril in the Second, which required me to read two books by today. I actually went way above and beyond the two books–it’s hard not to get caught up in the Halloween/fall spirit around this time! I read:
The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane, by Katherine Howe
Her Fearful Symmetry, by Audrey Niffenegger
One Foot Wrong, Sofie Laguna
Twilight, Stephenie Meyer
The House of the Seven Gables, Nathaniel Hawthorne
Honestly, I would have read more for this challenge if I’d had the time! I’m already anticipating RIP V!
The Maud Hart Lovelace reading challenge only ran for a month, so I knew when I started it that I would never be able to read all ten Betsy and Tacy books unless I chose to forego all other reading material. I am happy to say, however, that I read the first four books. I hope to read the remaining six very soon. I read:
Betsy-Tacy
Betsy, Tacy and Tib
Betsy and Tacy go Over the Big Hill
Betsy and Tacy go Downtown
For those of you that aren’t familiar with this series, I strongly urge you to check it out!
There is still a month left for this challenge, but I wanted to give a status update. For the month of October, my stats are:
19 books read
9 were books I owned
3 were review copies
1 was a loaner from my mom
2 were from Bookswim
4 were from the library
So overall I did really well in this challenge for this month, with a 47%!! Of course, the read-a-thon helped my cause immensly–I am willing to bet my percentage next month is nowhere near this high.
And now for a new challenge!!
You can find all the info on this challenge at the blog created specifically for it, but I will go ahead and list some of the specifications and rules below.
The challenge runs from November 1, 2009-November 30, 2010, but you may join in the fun whenever you wish! Participants are encouraged to read nonfiction and fiction books related to the rather broad idea of ‘women’s studies.’
For nonfiction, this would include books on feminism, history books focused on women, biographies of women, memoirs (or travelogues) by women, essays by women and cultural books focused on women (body image, motherhood, etc.). The topics I’ve listed aren’t mean to be exhaustive; if you come across a nonfiction book whose subject is female-related, it counts! Of course, if you’re not sure you can always ask about it in a comment. And if you need some ideas for specific books, check out the ‘Reading Lists’ page.
It’s trickier to say what is applicable as fiction. Obviously, any classic fiction written by a feminist is applicable. But where do we go from there? To speak generally, if the book takes a thoughtful look at the place of women in society, it will probably count. At the end of the day, it’s up to you to explain in your review why you chose this for the challenge and its connection to women’s studies. Once again, if you need some specific ideas, check out the ‘Reading Lists’ page.
One quick note about author gender. There isn’t a rule if a book’s written by a woman it counts and if by a man it doesn’t count. I firmly believe that men can be feminists and that not all women are feminists. As long as the book adheres to the definition of women’s studies I’ve shared above, it counts.
Interested in participating? Great! There are three levels you can choose as a reader (you can count books for other challenges as well):
- Philogynist: read at least two books, including at least one nonfiction one.
- Bluestocking: read at least five books, including at least two nonfiction ones.
- Suffragette: read at least eight books, including at least three nonfiction ones.
I plan on participating at the bluestocking level. I am unsure at this point what books I’ll be reading, but here are the possibilities:
Fiction:
Speak, Laurie Halse Anderson
Beloved, Toni Morrison
The Color Purple, Alice Walker
Housekeeping, Marilynn Robinson
Nonfiction:
Death and the Maidens, Janet Todd
Obviously my list is lacking, especially when it comes to nonfiction. Hopefully I’ll be adding to it–I’m open to suggestions!
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Betsy-Tacy, challenges, RIP IV, women unbound challenge | 7 Comments »







The House of the Seven Gables
writings. The house stood for all the greed and relentlessness of the Pyncheon family and throughout the book it became more and more apparent to the reader that the house was not the source of the Pyncheon’s problems but rather a symbol of their greed.
Ah, there is nothing more enticing than fall when it comes to reading. I don’t know what it is; perhaps the coziness of being curled up with a good book as the weather outside gets colder. The arrival of Starbucks’ Pumpkin Spice Latte is a definite plus. I love getting one every once in awhile as a special treat and I cannot think of a better way to enjoy one than with a good book in hand.
I only read one story, but it was a good one: “Death by Landscape”, by Margaret Atwood. It can be found in the anthology Mistresses of the Dark: 25 Macabre Tales by Master Storytellers. It was the first story in the book and I figured, What the heck, I love Margaret Atwood. Why not start with this one? It was a good choice. Lois is sent to an all girls summer camp ever summer from the age of nine until the age of thirteen. The story took place many, many decades ago, and while Lois finds herself loathing camp at first, by the time the summer that she is 13 rolls around, she very much anticipates camp. She has made a friend, Lucy, there and they have written to each other the past two winters. Lucy is a bit unattainable to Lois; she seems to have it all. Unfortunately, by that summer, Lucy’s life has started unraveling and she no longer seems to have the perfect life. Lois is not too perceptive to all this, still choosing to see all that Lucy has as opposed to all she doesn’t have, but Lucy’s grief is unveiled a bit for the reader. 
The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane
advisor, Manning Chilton, says to her “Just because you don’t believe in something doesn’t mean it isn’t real.” This really resonated with me and from that point on, I was hooked. I found there to be much truth in his words, although not necessarily in the context of this book. We are all guilty of believing something to be false just because that is what has been drilled into our heads. In Connie’s situation, she had not once dreamed that there could have been any merits to the accusations made against the women put to death in Salem in the late seventeenth century. Of course the obvious answer is that the accusors in Salem were pointing the finger at these “witches” for some sort of personal gain. What their reasoning was, I don’t think we’ll ever know, but one option that has never been touched upon is that they did it because the accused really were witches. Now, as I mentioned earlier, I am too much of a skeptic to believe that there is any truth to that theory, but The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane is fiction; historical fiction, but fiction nontheless. So although I don’t believe there is any substance to this theory in reality, I very much enjoyed seeing it play out in the book.
belief is rarely seen; the change in perception is largely due to science because we now know what causes most diseases and have found a remedy to keep such sicknesses at bay.
This week hasn’t necessarily been the best reading week for me. The two books I read were not books I would generally read, which isn’t always a bad thing, but in this case I felt that there wasn’t as much substance involved. The first book, Rude Awakenings of a Jane Austen Addict, was a fun read, but it
was chick lit. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I used to be a huge chick lit fan, so I’m not knocking it. Chick lit is just not my thing anymore. And while it was nice to have a change of pace, I don’t think I’ll be reading the prequel anytime soon. As for Rattled, it also skirted the lines of chick lit. While it dealt with some very heavy topics, it still was a quick read thatdidn’t take itself too seriously. So now I’m reading Sea of Poppies, by Amitav Ghosh. I was skeptical at first. In fact, I considered putting it down at first. It is historical fiction that deals with the opium trade in India and the author includes a lot of language and phraseology that is impossible for me to understand. However, I discovered fairly quickly that Sea of Poppies is an engaging read, so I’m glad I stuck with it in the beginning.